wrong, was bound to have adopted.
ли баширать
seems to admit
that the Chinese Passenger Act is strictly carried out in tonations, but states that the check on the number spassengers imposed by that act cancer" the tears of Straits "Emigrants to go from Ports and in "Ships not British" If this be as Houshow is not responsible for the Chinese Emigrants thus alluded to are not residents of Stonations, to not leave Houstons for their bestination, and it in Stoulkong at all are not
by
any possibility to be bistinquished from the suncions visitants to this Sity, of whom
one of the baily
238
Steamers from Canton has been known
two thousand at a single
to
carry
trip.
To say that because some one has been temporarily in Hongkong and chooses entrequently to go chewhere and thence to the Straits (a Pritish Settlement) such an one or some one his behalf has cause of complaint againat Houghtong (whitter for benefite conferred or wrong sustained dres not appear) is a course of argument which I fail to understand -
On the Tahiti question I have procured all the explanation possible, 'ands shall only say
that
as
to Mr
Sampson's interview with Wohang
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.